PulaVet Linkby AIgentIQ
Real environmental context · Synthetic cases

Livestock reporting · Veterinary escalation

Turn a field observation into a clearer veterinary handoff.

Synthetic livestock cases combined with observed district-level environmental context from June 2025 to May 2026 and conservative escalation—without diagnostic claims.

Start a synthetic report ↓ Review safety boundary ↗

Decision supported

Should this observation receive routine, priority or urgent veterinary review?
Context coverage
25 areas
Demo window
Jun 2025–May 2026
Decision baseline
Rules
Live routing
Disabled

01 · Controlled workflow

Build a structured report

Use fictional information only. Nothing is submitted, uploaded or retained.

Guided casesLoad a synthetic scenario
Area of reporting

Select a Botswana district

Reporting monthMay 2026
Below historical same-month mean Near historical mean Above historical mean

Boundaries: geoBoundaries, CC BY 4.0, simplified for display. Visualisation is not a legal boundary determination.

1

Case context

When, where and which animals?

2

Visible concern

Describe observations, not a diagnosis.

Optional visible-concern screening

Add a cattle image to the guided workflow

Step 1 of 5 · Pathway

Controlled adapter demonstration · no diagnosis · no upload or retention

Specific visible concerns
3

Safety check

Unknown answers remain visible and raise review priority.

4

Movement and field conditions

Farmer-reported context that environmental data cannot verify.

5

Consent and image metadata

A selected image is previewed locally; its bytes are not transmitted or retained.

02 · Evidence architecture

Input

Farmer observation

Structured counts, visible signs, safety answers and explicit consent.

Context

District · month

Versioned environmental export with provenance and uncertainty.

Decision

Conservative rules

Transparent non-AI baseline; missingness cannot lower escalation.

Output

Veterinary handoff

Reason-coded summary for human review. No operational routing.

03 · Responsible use

Built to support review,
not replace it.

01No clinical conclusionObservations and context are kept distinct from veterinary judgment.

02No hidden integrationFarmSight/EACS and ClimateHealth Sentinel remain independent upstream capabilities.

03No operational routingDVS contacts and zones require current partner approval before use.

04Synthetic demonstrationNo field validation, partner endorsement or impact is claimed.

04 · Funder evidence and data gap

What works now—and what funding must establish.

PulaVet Link can already connect structured reporting, real environmental context and conservative escalation. The governed Botswana evidence layer remains the investment case.

Already available

Demonstrable now

  • Climate and environmental context
  • Controlled synthetic workflow
  • Non-diagnostic safety rules
  • Structured case schema
  • GLW4 planning and WAHIS disease-history context—reference only, not used in the case decision
Investment needed

Build the evidence layer

  • Farmer and veterinary co-design
  • Current DVS routing and approvals
  • Consented Botswana observations and images
  • Healthy, negative and look-alike cases
  • Veterinary assessments and laboratory outcomes
  • Observed water, grazing and heat conditions
What the pilot will test

Earn the next claim

  • Completeness, completion time and usability
  • Veterinary usefulness
  • Urgent-case escalation and false-negative safety
  • Mapped versus observed conditions
  • Consent comprehension and continued use